Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot Hail Comics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Hot Hail Comics

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Declining speedy per article talk page; taking to AfD and notifying WT:COMICS. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 21:23, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 21:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 21:26, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete largely for no citation. I guess some small amount of notability exists since they apparently published one (although only one) issue of Captain Canuck, but per WP:COMPANY an organization or business is only really notable if it has been "the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independant secondary sources".  A quick google search and I find the exact phrase "Hot Hail Comics" only appearing on website that sell comics, in association with the one Captain Canuck issue.  This article needs to demonstrate that the company has been covered by the media, not just that it exists. -Markeer 21:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. No reliable sources talk about it or even mention it as far as I can tell. Tim  meh  !  23:28, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  —Emperor (talk) 23:56, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete-it's crapYourname (talk) 01:30, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * that is not a reason for speedy deletion; at worst, the company is merely non-notable. Speedy delete only applies for the reasons given in WP:CSD . DGG (talk) 02:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:N and WP:V. (Emperor (talk) 03:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC))


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.