Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot europa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 01:44, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Hot europa

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Insufficient evidence that this neologism is widely used; wikipedia is not a place to try to coin new terms. Renaming would not be useful, Extrasolar moon already exists. ErikHaugen (talk) 15:18, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Redirecting would also be inappropriate, since the existence of the redirect suggests that the term is legitimate, and it afaik is not, so that would be misleading. ErikHaugen (talk) 15:47, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Author of this page created this term. A google search finds it in one place - Wikipedia. This needs to go asap. Jusdafax  17:05, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Utterly un-notable term made up by the author. No evidence anyone besides the original author uses this term. Making up planet classification systems may be fun but it is not encyclopaedic. Icalanise (talk) 17:27, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I removed the prod because I believed the concept of an extra solar moon existing within a stars habitable zone was very important. But I have since added this singular point to extrasolar moon. Delete per nomination. Jdrewitt (talk) 18:00, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete — No evidence is cited that this neologism exists. One magazine article is linked but it can only be read by magazine subscribers, so it is unverifiable. The beginning of the article can be read but there is no mention of a Europa of any temperature.  --O&#39;Dea (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 18:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC).
 * Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 20:17, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Original author claims to have made up the term, see talk:Hot europa. ErikHaugen (talk) 22:32, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete pure WP:OR and WP:NEO . The term is made up by the author as the author admits on the talk page. 76.66.193.224 (talk) 03:32, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete — The person who wrote the article admits at talk:Hot europa that he invented the term. He was asked, "Where did you get the term "hot europa?" Did you read that in an article or book? Did you make it up?" and his reply was, "short answer yes". Case closed. --O&#39;Dea (talk) 08:25, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: for all the reasons listed above. --Gyrobo (talk) 23:13, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Interesting concept. I have to admire the creator for original thought. It's a shame we can't have an article on it :( --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.