Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotdog stand


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Ifnord 15:19, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Hotdog stand

 * del dicdef. mikka (t) 23:28, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. [[Image:Monkeyman.png]]Monkeyman(talk) 23:37, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete As pointless as Hamburger stand above.  (aeropagitica)   23:50, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep (or move to Hot dog stand and redirect). The hot dog stand seems like a major American cultural icon to me, much more so than the hamburger stand.  A history of hot dog stands could be a great article, and it would be more likely to get created if this stub exists.  --Allen 01:55, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - these are familiar terms to North Americans perhaps, but not necessarily to other English countries where such things are not in the cultural norm. --HappyCamper 02:52, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as a valid, if nearly content-free, stub. That first sentence is a doozy ("A hot dog stand is a stand that sells hot dogs." Who'd have guessed? :) - Turnstep 04:15, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * content-free means worse than "dicdef". wikipedia is not a dictionary mikka (t) 06:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, but "nearly" means "not completely" :) Turnstep 17:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to Mobile catering and expand about taco trucks and other such businesses around the world. Doesn't London still have fish & chip stands? Gazpacho 06:56, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Are you sure that all "hotdog stands" are "mobil catering"? Anyway, Gazpacho, since you wrote all this by yourself, you may forget about move and cut and paste the text into Mobile catering page. mikka (t) 08:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Good idea. Gazpacho 09:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Allen. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  10:41, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as notable. --Ter e nce Ong 12:20, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Allen.  young  american  (talk) 16:23, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Allen Knowitall 17:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.