Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotel Føroyar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep per WP:SK. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete !votes. (Non-administrator closure.) NorthAmerica1000 12:42, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Hotel Føroyar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article written like an advertisement (first class restaurant etc) on an ordinary hotel. I doubt it complies with our corporate notability rules. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 09:57, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Keep Probably the most notable hotel in the Faroe Islands, and has been owned by its main transport company Smyril. Also contains a very notable restaurant with extensive coverage and acclaim as the best restaurant in the Faroes. Inadequate nom. If you don't know "our corporate notability rules", don't nominate articles for deletion until you're better equipped to judge notability.♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:27, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Reply - Inadequate nom? Doctor, did you see the article when I nominated it? Ah, yes, you did, because you rushed in 11 minutes to develop the article which was created by yourself. Thanks for your recent contributions, around 20, to the article. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 10:33, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * There wasn't that much wrong with it aside from a need of better sourcing and a copyedit. In 2009 most of the sources I added today didn't exist. Yes, you shouldn't nominate articles for deletion which have so many hits in reliable sources. 85% of our articles are in a bad way, is the solution to delete everything or improve them?♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:44, 6 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Snow Keep, we have WP:BEFORE as to avoid this sort of nominations. Cavarrone 10:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I withdraw the nomination as the article is now acceptable, thanks to the efforts of User:Dr. Blofeld. Thanks to all for participating and regards. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 11:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.