Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotklub


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 23:40, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Hotklub

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable "secret" club. Appears to be all OR. Then has a section on a song that is supposedly about the "secret" club. Caffeyw (talk) 11:32, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:49, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:49, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Done some googling and no joy.  The only source available appears to be a self-produced music video/short film with limited distribution, and I can't even find a representation that what it depicts is not fictitious - the original editor's version of the article is explicitly about it as a film, and doesn't imply it's a documentary.  If we turn out to have proper written sources on this, then fine, but we wouldn't want to keep much if any of the prose here, anyway.  Morwen (talk) 12:00, 25 August 2013 (UTC)




 * Delete for complete failure of WP:NF. While even the earlier versions of this article failed, later edits have made it ridiculous.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 17:57, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete This was started in good faith about a non-notable short film, and was turned into a hoax article in 2008 and never fixed. There's no reason to keep this. Nick-D (talk) 08:43, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as it does appear to be a hoax built on top of an article for a non-notable film... even if it's not a hoax no sourcing can be found to support any of it, and the result's the same.   03:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.