Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotness (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete (G4). King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 09:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Hotness (album)
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is the sixth AfD I know for this album, under various names: 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. All previous arguments apply, there is no source in the article that hasn't been discussed before. The only thing we know is that Rihanna expects to "definitely release" an album in 2009, and that Chris Brown said in an interview that he was writing for the album. There is no source for the title, PROD was declined. Still fails WP:V, WP:MUSIC and WP:CRYSTAL. Amalthea 13:25, 12 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as repost.&mdash;Kww(talk) 13:38, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete alone for not only, as the article puts it, "The title of album is still unknown", but the double mention of rumour. Plus the above of course. --➨♀♂ Candlewicke STundefined 16:56, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's just unsourced speculation. Dawn Bard (talk) 17:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete By G4 as this article is a recreation of deleted material Pstanton 19:46, 12 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pstanton (talk • contribs)
 * Speedy delete G4 - just changing the title of the article to "Hotness" when it still says "The title of album is still unknown" does not alter the fact that this is the same rumour-based fluff that has already been deleted FIVE times. JohnCD (talk) 21:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * ... and don't forget the at least a dozen times when it was speedied. I didn't consider this one a recreation since it appeared to have grown at this place. That might have been wrong though since it was pretty much replaced in this revision – might actually have been a proper G4. -- Amalthea 21:08, 13 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.