Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hounds Tooth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. ff m  01:10, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Hounds Tooth

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No references cited to support what band has done, and even what information is in the article does not meet WP:MUSIC. Nv8200p talk 23:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 23:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 23:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)


 * comment For what its worth, here's a couple of sources i managed to find on google: and . I'm not sure if those count as reliable sources or not, which is why i'm not voting either way. Umbralcorax (talk) 03:32, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * These seem like nominal coverage of a local band in the local news. The references support the fact that the band has not met any of the other criteria of WP:MUSIC. -Nv8200p talk 13:54, 25 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - the notability bar is not very high, and this groups has received coverage in the press. -- Whpq (talk) 17:31, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It is higher then what this group has to offer. -Nv8200p talk 22:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I do not see what deleting the article would accomplish. The press kit at http://www.houndstoothblues.com/presskit/ mentions several press links. -- Mvuijlst (talk) 20:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Again, the press links are all local Milwaukee publications -Nv8200p talk 22:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Um... so? Is the circulation of the publication relevant? Or the area in which it is read? No, really: I don't see what harm this article -- this stub, really -- is doing anyone. Mvuijlst (talk) 22:02, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * (oh, and before I get hit with a WP:NOTDIR -- Hounds Tooth does too meet WP:MUSIC. Multiple, non-trivial published works. (don't know why I bother, really. tss.) Mvuijlst (talk) 22:11, 27 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.