Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House cord


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:05, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

House cord

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NOTDICTIONARY -War wizard90 (talk) 23:52, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 23:52, 30 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete – WP:NOTDICT This term can be added to the list of terms in Cord (unit). As this term is defined as one-third of a cord, I also point to Articles for deletion/Quarter yard for comparison and precedence. — Jkudlick t c s 07:29, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: The "article" is the usual mishmash of (unreliable) numbers from the Cardarelli source, and confusion, total confusion: house/face code/cord may all be referring to the same thing. So there is no content of any value, and it is not even clear whether the headword (oops, I forgot, WP:NOTADICTIONARY) even exists. Imaginatorium (talk) 08:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above. Are we ever going to be done with all these silly unit articles from Cardarelli?PianoDan (talk) 19:42, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: no reliable evidence that the term exists, and total confusion in the article. Pam  D  23:54, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above, especially Jkudlick. Shanata (talk) 07:33, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.