Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House of Camino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete via Snowball-- JForget 00:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

House of Camino

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a genealogical entry for what appears to be a very minor line of nobility. Aside from that, the article appears to be a POV original research essay, and all but one of the links given as sources don't work. The one that does doesn't appear to be relevant. Core desat 04:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * delete. Essayish biography on a non-notable family. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 04:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator's reasoning. My goodness, look at all those redlinks! Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  10:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasoning of nominator, too original researchy for my taste.  Bur nt sau ce  16:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, reads like a hoax to me. None of the references goes specifically to a page which mentions these people, just to a general index page where you'd have to figure out the Spanish text in order to do any searches, and the www.huanusco.gob.mx page has been suspended, with no explanation.  There are zero Google hits for "Samuel del Camino".  Corvus cornix 18:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, another fake nobility page. Mindraker 20:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

delete per nom. Cheers, :) Dloh cierekim  21:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - none of it checks out. The creator's bad-faith request for page protection looks suspicious too. Gordonofcartoon 03:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: See Articles for deletion/Sancho de Leόn, an article created by the same editor as this one. Corvus cornix 19:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete and call for SNOWBALL. Multiple 'sources' don't exist at all, looks like a hoax. ThuranX 20:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.