Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House of Hohenzollern / Albrecht Line


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Bearian (talk) 16:48, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

House of Hohenzollern / Albrecht Line

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lack of WP:Notability und WP:Verifiability. There is no real source that proves the existence of this line. It appears that the author made up a couple of members as well: Horst Albrecht von Preußen and Erich Albrecht von Preußen for example. Millbart (talk) 01:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅, per Millbart. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:59, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:55, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:55, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Ich möchte Sie höflichst bitten das Sie sich die auf dieser Seite aufgeführten Referenzen anzuschauen. Sie müssten diese Artikel allerdings schon richtig lesen und verstehen. Falls Sie Nachfragen haben sollten stehe ich Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung. HRH Prinz Peter Eric Albrecht von Preußen 15:51, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Ich möchte dich höflich bitten uns hier nicht über mehrere Sprachversionen zum Narren zu halten. Deine Artikel wurden als eindeutiger Fake enttarnt, weshalb du in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia bereits bis in alle Ewigkeit gesperrt bist und auch hier wird es sicher nicht mehr lange dauern, wenn du so weiter machst. --StG1990 (talk) 15:57, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Translation: I want politely that you do not trick us across different languageversions. Your article has been detected as a clear fake and because of that you've haved blocked in the German Wikipedia already till infinity. Here the same will happen in a short time, if you go on like before. --StG1990 (talk) 16:05, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Über Ihren Ton und Ihres un-diplomatische auftreten bin ich nicht erfreut. Auch Ihre Zensieren gefällt mir nicht - dies sind undemokratische Vorgehensweisen: Ich lasse mich auch nicht von Ihnen einschüchtern. Dies sind Nazi oder Kommunisten Methoden die Sie anwenden. Falls diese Seiten auf den USA gesperrt werden, werden wir hier gerichtlich vorgehen. Bitte bedenken Sie dies!
 * Translation: I am shocked about your undiplomatic behavior and your ruthless communications style. I also dislike your censorship these are non democratic actions you are taking. I also stand up to your bullying. Bullying are Nazi and Communist Trademarks. I will stand for this! Please keep in mind that we will take legal action in court if our Wikipedia sites here in the US are blocked, temper with or vandalized. HRH Prinz Peter Eric Albrecht von Preußen 16:37, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * In the german spoken Wikipedia your communition style you would be infinit blocked soon - which was happend yesterday. To threat with the law is allready a reason. There are no rights by law for having a Wikipedia ariticel. --Codc (talk) 17:00, 10 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. In view of the evident COI, this would require much better sourcing. The last para seems to indicate an intention to add numerous spam links. Note that the author has been blocked on :de (where checks would be easier) for adding "Fakes". JohnCD (talk) 22:35, 11 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Poorly sourced, dubious claims, clear COI. Favonian (talk) 11:47, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.