Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House of the Congress of magistrates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SST  flyer  02:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

House of the Congress of magistrates

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article really has no claim to significance. The single cited source also has no claim of significance and has very very little information. It would appear that most of it not all of the encyclopedic information is original, uncited research. bojo 1498  talk  17:39, 16 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:57, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 16:22, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Per WP:GEOFEAT, heritage-listed buildings are notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - per . This is most definitely a listed building of cultural/historic significance with the Russian Ministry of Culture. I don't think the name is correct - it used to belong to the Emir of Bukhara but it must have been a court at some time. Title can be fixed. I corrected the ref and added coordinates. I'll try to find more refs later.  —Мандичка YO 😜 03:52, 1 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.