Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House where the Bottom Fell out


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 22:20, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

House where the Bottom Fell out

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Without one secondary or tertiary reference this is patently not notable). Artist's main article already deleted as spam. The apparently extensive reference list is copied wholesale from the now deleted artist's page-most don't even mention the artist, let alone this work. Debate (talk) 09:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


 * See further commentary at Talk:House_where_the_Bottom_Fell_out. Debate (talk) 09:52, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - grossly fails all the tests, particularly verifiability and notability. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:57, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - an in-depth article about a piece of art, but still non-notable. References are un-related to the article. Tnxman307 (talk) 16:06, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.   —Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 17:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the sources is really about the subject, and the artist in question is a red link. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  freshacconci  speak to me  17:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per the exhaustive source analysis at talk and no evidence of other notability via reliable sources TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 19:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above..Modernist (talk) 02:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom's excellent analysis. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 04:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.