Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Househappy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Househappy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I see only local sources, or sources that provide an incidental mention, neither of which prove notability. It seems that all small startups sponsored by various incubators manage to get a small amount of publicity. Some actual degree of success should be needed before they get into an encyclopedia--there is no need for us to emulate a web directory.  DGG ( talk ) 21:45, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I think it's too soon and I'm not seeing substantial coverage in reliable independent sources for this recent startup. Candleabracadabra (talk) 00:30, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 17 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  17:22, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as no evidence of notability. →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  18:15, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.