Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Housejoy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Don't usually close on 2 !votes however it's been relisted twice already and so I don't have much hope of a 3rd relist achieving anything so wrapping it up as Keep (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 22:42, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Housejoy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Newly started company and all of the listed sources are exactly for this and they consist of: PR or PR-speak, trivial coverage such as interviews, news about funding, financing or partnerships, all of which are of course expected from such new companies so it summarizes there's still no actual convincing substance. SwisterTwister  talk  07:08, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Going by the wiki guidelines, I have mentioned the name of the authors/writers for every reference and have also included some links in the Further Read section. The referencing domains have substantial goodwill and the articles aren't trivial in nature. Although some articles are talking about funding but i don't think the big money funding, acquisitions or merger coverage can be written off as trivial news(a little insight about this will help). Overall, I think the article follows all the guidelines and can be a good stub, up for a further expansion. Nishant

 References  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep – Meets WP:CORPDEPTH per a review of available sources. Source examples include, but are not limited to the bylined news articles written by staff writers that have been published in independent, reliable sources, listed below. Regarding the age the company, which has nothing to do with notability, see WP:NEWCOMPANY. North America1000 08:27, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Tech in Asia (published by Tech in Asia)
 * Business Standard
 * The Economic Times
 * First Post
 * Fortune
 * Mint

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:35, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. KGirlTrucker81talk what I'm been doing 02:16, 24 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.