Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Houseless


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Homelessness. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:28, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Houseless

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

POV fork of homeless, synthesis, only 4 sources, promo for the Bosa Properties X Prize Foundation. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Homelessness I don't think so. ~ Junior5a   (Talk)   Cont  00:29, 1 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Homelessness. After searching for the term, I were only able to find fringe blog posts which differentiate between homelessness and houselessness. I were able to find large numbers of actual coverage which all used it as a synonym for homeless like in this example: . Mr. Magoo (talk) 00:46, 1 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Homelessness. Per reasons above, plus there was only 4 sources on Google, one of which was a dictionary definition, another was a source that's already being used in Homelessness. Much of this content could probably be used in Homelessness, as this article attempts to branch itself off into its own article to give the false impression that the term "houseless" is more notable than actually is, in that the Homelessness article itself already does cover the "houseless" topic somewhat. — Mythdon ( talk ) 01:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Homelessness. A quick google search on the difference between houselessness and homelessness gives a few sources that make a meaningless differentiation between home as a sort-of sense of belonging and house as the physical building. Moira98 (talk) 17:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Homelessness. Doesn't really need another !vote to that effect, but I came across it and it seems pretty straightforward. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 16:09, 4 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.