Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoveround


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep (closed by non-admin) rewrite has happened, consensus is keep. RMHED 23:25, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Hoveround

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article asserts no notability; I don't think A7 covers products. Will (talk) 01:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * delete advertisement stub. Not necessarily opposed to article on principle tho---if it were expanded/enhanced, I could see the potential of keeping it.Balloonman 01:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and rewrite to focus on the company, not the product. Hoveround Corporation easily passes WP:CORP as a major distributor of power wheelchairs. If I can find time, I'll try to rework this myself. By the way, does anyone else remember these seeing these commercials in the '90s? "Now I'm free to see the world!" &mdash; dust mite  01:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I did a quick rewrite. Still a stub, but I think notability is now more apparent. &mdash; dust mite  02:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable and not well-written. NHRHS2010  talk  02:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per bluedustmite. These things were inescapable back in the day, and they still show ads for it now. JuJube 02:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep sources seem to exist for this to meet WP:CORP. That an article isn't well-written is a reason to improve the article, not delete it. --W.marsh 03:06, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Apparently there was a prior AFD at Articles for deletion/Tom Kruse (inventor) closed by yours truly. I had forgotten entirely. --W.marsh 03:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - Quite notable, who HASN'T seen those catchy Hoveround ads? ViperSnake151 03:47, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: Notable, needs work, not deletion. - Rjd0060 04:47, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as a search on Google turns up sufficient reliable sources. VivioFa  teFan  (Talk, Sandbox) 04:48, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep-Rewrite notable device but in need of some editing work, right now it just sounds like a quickie ad. -- DP 67  (talk/contribs) 06:09, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per dustmite. Now I'm free to see the world. Maxamegalon2000 07:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.