Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How I Feel (Kelly Clarkson song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirected to My December per WP:MUSIC, this can alsways be reversed if it gains independent notability.  BLACK KITE  17:22, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

How I Feel (Kelly Clarkson song)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Song is not a single, it is wishful thinking, a page is not required for it Alankc (talk) 20:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect to My December, logical choice for a song that doesn't deserve its own page. Also redirect How I Feel (Kelly Clarkson) to My December to prevent a double redirect. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Why? What reader is going to enter this exact title into the search box? Uncle G (talk) 21:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The fact that there is a strong possibility it will be released as a single means that there is a good chance someone who knows Wikipedia documents most singles individualy will type it in, IMO. Besides, a redirect is harmless, and if only one user is redirected, it will have done some good. There's a guidline on that somewhere, I'll add it here if I can find it. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 12:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I couldn't. I suspect it's probably merged somehwere. Basicly, it aid redirects should generally be put in place wherever possible unless they are directly harmful. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 12:51, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * You haven't answered the question. What reader is going to enter "How I Feel (Kelly Clarkson song)" into the search box? Uncle G (talk) 15:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * One who saw it wasn't at How I Feel but some other song has been disambiguated in this way. They might assume that by typing the above in, instead of following the link to the album, they could get to the song. We may as well make life easier for them. Also, they may know of other songs disambiguated in this manner and thus type it in directly; often song articles are written at titles that disambiguate unnesesariliy. Hey, on the side, you gotta apreciate the funny side of two editor arguing over such an unimportant point, huh? ;-) Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 16:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * A reader who reached How I Feel by typing "How I Feel" into the search box would follow the disambiguation headnote pointing to the article to read (assuming that hasn't misguidedly edited it out again in the meantime).  Uncle G (talk) 18:30, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * There's no need for the link, or this artcile, have any of you even read it? The article itself is nothing but a crystal ball, and promotion for a fansite project. The referacnes are links to myspace pages, not actual resources. It clearly vilates wikipedia standards in more than one way. You all just love to argue and debate way too much. 76.109.54.18 (talk) 03:20, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete with no prejudice against re-creation when this is Clarkson's next single, and charts as such. See WP:CRYSTAL.   Keeper   |   76  21:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect If a release date had been anounced, and it was sometime soon, I might have waited until then to see if anything happened right off, and then decided, but in this case we have no idea. No issues with allowing it to return when the subject is notable. See WP:NOT. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 21:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * See above. Uncle G (talk) 21:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * note: the article itself says it's all based on RUMORS and promoting a project from a fansite. if i'm not mistaken, that goes against everything about wikipedia. Even the referances are just links to myspaces and the site, which is promotion, not referance. it's clearly self=-promoting a fansite (and myspaces) and definatley falls under crystal ballism. what's the debate all about? 76.109.54.18 (talk) 23:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.