Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How I Quit Google to Sell Samosas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Munaf Kapadia. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain (talk) 19:39, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

How I Quit Google to Sell Samosas

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable book. Essentially an advert.  scope_creep Talk  16:45, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Two lines in the Deccan Herald is hardly in-depth significant coverage, the Week.in magazine coverage actually states that the author is "great at selling his story" and the print.in is not an independent source. Theroadislong (talk) 16:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — I do not see any criterion from NBOOK being met. Celestina007 (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Merge/redirect to Munaf Kapadia, the author of the book, per Deletion policy. The content of this article written by can be used to expand the author's article. The book was published on 10 April 2021 and received coverage just today on 2 May 2021 as I make this comment: The article notes, "What is compelling about the book is how brutally honest Kapadia has been. ... Unlike most “passion-to-paycheque” startup stories, Kapadia’s does not exactly end on a high note. With the pandemic, his business took a hit. Many outlets had to be shut down and he had to let go of some of the staff."If How I Quit Google to Sell Samosas continues to receive significant coverage and reviews, I would support undoing the redirect and restoring the article since the book would meet Notability (books), which says: "A book is presumed notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria:The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself."Cunard (talk) 11:00, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom, clearly an advert and I am honestly a little bit concerned about the COI Editing CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:12, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — Fails WP:NBOOK. Google search picked up this which barely talks anything about the book and obviously does not qualify as substantial coverage. -- Ashley yoursmile!  14:33, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment It states in the article: That is because Kapadia, 31, a former account strategist at Google, not only has an engaging story to tell, but he is also great at selling his story.. That is not a good source. It is not reliable.    scope_creep Talk  14:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Munaf Kapadia As per Cunard and as the creator of this stub, I support this action rather than getting it deleted. Dial911 (talk) 17:42, 2 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.