Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How To Test Congruent and Similar Triangles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:59, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

How To Test Congruent and Similar Triangles

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The first two paragraphs are from Triangle, the last line was copied from, and the rest is covered elsewhere. Delete Alksub 23:57, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. A comparison of the title of this page and Wikipedia is not a "How to" guide is possibly relevant here. Grutness...wha?  00:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * TransWiki: To wikibooks or rewrite article to make it encyclopedic. Despite the title of the page, I don't think it is violating WP:NOT. - Rjd0060 00:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - essentially redundant with Congruence (geometry), and written in a less encyclopedic way. No problem with transwikying if someone cares to do it, but it's probably not worth the trouble of trying to find somewhere to merge the content. — xDanielx T/C 01:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unnotable very basic geometry. Should we also have an article on How to add, subtract, multiply and divide? Clarityfiend 02:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't open a can of WP:BEANS on us... Stifle (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Contains basic geometry that should be in other articles -- Imperator3733 06:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete if Transwiki to Wikibooks is not possible.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 10:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unencyclopedic. Stifle (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with xDanielx: redundant with Congruence (geometry). There's no point in merging or leaving a redirect from this name, which anyway is not capitalized properly according to our conventions. —David Eppstein 16:44, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.