Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How disability should be researched


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete under WP:CSD by. Non-admin closure of deleted article. § FreeRangeFrog croak 07:40, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

How disability should be researched

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not an essay that covers non-notable, non-neutral topics. TBr  and  ley  02:26, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete With a plow because WP:NOTJOURNAL. § FreeRangeFrog croak 02:40, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOTJOURNAL GregJackP   Boomer!   03:01, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: essay, unencyclopedic. Hairhorn (talk) 03:41, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete CSD A10, duplicates Disability studies and I have tagged it for speedy deletion. Safiel (talk) 04:12, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: I've salvaged the references and pasted them at Talk:Disability studies, since most references were not duplicates and may be useful there. הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 04:20, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.