Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to Catch a Wild Asparagus-Snatching Snagglysnort


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 02:25, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

How to Catch a Wild Asparagus-Snatching Snagglysnort

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

"Very few people know about this computer game software." That says it all. Non-notable. A google search for "SnagglySnort -wikipedia -ebay" gets a whole 21 hits, and the only 2 that look promising are restricted to paid magazine subscribers. DES (talk) 00:52, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as per my nom. DES (talk) 00:52, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn software. Wow, I thought I'd never hear that title again -- I saw a review for it once in MacAddict about ten years ago, but I'd forgotten since then. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 01:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not of a encyclopedic nature nor is it notable -- Mattl2001   talk  |  contribs  02:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom, although the fact that Ten Pound Hammer  can remember an ad for it ten years later is FREAKY, man. Lipsticked Pig 04:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. JJL 05:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: non-notable. Also, the external link in the article points to a 59-page doument listing all sorts of non-notable educational software (this one is mentioned in a few lines at the top of page 36). Lets hope no-one decides to create articles for all the others!  --RFBailey 09:49, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete —  No search engine results, not referenced well.  *Cremepuff 222*  " As cool as grapes... "  18:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the lack of notability. I also second Lipsticked Pig's comment about Ten Pound Hammer 's tangential memory. Cheers, Lanky TALK 14:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.