Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to keep an idiot busy for hours (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep --Bubba hotep 20:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

How to keep an idiot busy for hours

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

User:Michaelbusch has prodded this article and clearly wants it deleted because it's a silly joke. I'm not sure, especially because it survived a previous AFD, so I'll let you decide. No vote. YechielMan 17:28, 29 March 2007 (UTC) How to keep an idiot busy for hours? Let him create an In Popular Culture article on Wikipedia. Plasticbottle 01:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per previous AFD. My only concern is whether the title can be changed to something else ... and on behalf of everyone here I'll give my friend a kick in the pants who looked over my shoulder and suggested "Redirect to Wikipedia". ;-) 23skidoo 18:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep You may as well withdraw the nom, for now. As far as I can see, the PROD is baseless. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ speak ○ see ○ 19:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: The prior AfD ended with "either keep or no consensus" as the reason. For this, though the source OF the joke is attributed, there is nothing compatible with WP:ATT which would support its notability or importance to be contained in WP. Slavlin 19:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, well-known type of joke, with references. NawlinWiki 19:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - No assertion of WP:N.--Bryson 21:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as well-known joke. Spacepotato 22:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * comment i will refrain from taking a position because i do not have any opinion on whether jokes like this should be included in wikipedia; however, if they are to be included, this joke is certainly sufficiently widespread to pass judgment. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 00:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * keep more like waste his time on afd's for stuff that clearly is notable.  ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 06:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. Well-known joke. Ab e g92 contribs 13:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete are we getting this banal? Transwiki to Wikipedia:Jokes. Now, seriously, how is this notable? any proof that it has become part of popular culture? --FateClub 22:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, NN joke. Pavel Vozenilek 09:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep DXRAW 03:51, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Lugnuts 11:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per my original prod and the above statements that this doesn't meet WP:N or WP:ATT. Also, do we really want this on Wikipedia?  See Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense. Michaelbusch 22:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. No reason for deletion.Biophys 03:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, violates WP:N Prester John 18:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.