Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to lose weight fast and easy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. per WP:SNOW. Courcelles (talk) 12:56, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

How to lose weight fast and easy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Against WP:NOTGUIDE Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 23:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Big fat delete per nom.  JBsupreme  ( talk ) ✄ ✄ ✄	 02:33, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Go Away, Now nothing to see here, move along.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:07, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * We already have an encyclopaedia article on weight loss. This article provides nothing additional of value, and really provides no encyclopaedic content at all. Wikipedia is not this.  Delete. Uncle G (talk) 05:19, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. - It is not clear how an article like this could happen. Perhaps each signon should carry an internal flag that makes you click through a series of orientation webpages before you are allowed to create your first article. Racepacket (talk) 06:06, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Snow delete. I would normally suggest a merge to Weight loss, but I get the feeling that the creator didn't plan for this article to be anything but a violation of WP:NOTHOWTO. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:11, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Strongest possible delete - It's clearly a how-to guide: they've even put "Good luck! I hope this helped." in the last line. If that's not a sign of being a how-to guide, I don't know what is. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) &#124; (talk to me) &#124; (What I've done)  11:18, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Super speedy delete. Not quite an advertisement, but close to it. It's definitely not encyclopedic, and I don't know why it isn't dead yet.  2D ℳaestro  Dribble / Scribble 12:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.