Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Bishop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 08:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Howard Bishop

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to rise to the level of WP:NACTOR. Note: article creator has left an argument for keeping on the article's talk page. — swpb T 19:43, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as clearly not yet convincing for independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  22:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Slapping a delete notice on a page just eleven minutes after it was first created can be either an incentive to give up, or to plug on and enhance the content. The article creator has clearly researched further and found a number of notable productions which Bishop acted in - and not just as a walk-on, walk-off parts. (I skimmed through the video of You May Not Kiss the Bride and note he was billed just two names beneath Vinnie Jones on the front credits - clearly not an alphabetical listing.) All-in-all, I think he just falls the right side of the borderline for notability by meeting option 1 of WP:ENTHas had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. - at least four films with en.wiki pages for a start. As far as I can deduce from that policy's wording, he isn't expected to attain all three, is he? Parkywiki (talk) 13:21, 26 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * May I refer anyone interested further to the article's talk page?Yadsalohcin (talk) 11:42, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Bishop clearly passes the multiple significant roles in notable films criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  02:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep agree with previous poster that Bishop passes criteria 1 of WP:NACTOR of having prominent roles in notable films, notable meaning having wiki articles. Passing WPNACTOR only needs one of the three criteria to be met. Atlantic306 (talk) 21:58, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.