Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Ebison


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of The Apprentice candidates (UK). JohnCD (talk) 22:11, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Howard Ebison

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not sufficiently notable for an article in his own right. His involvement in The Apprentice is sufficiently covered by this section. Nothing he has done outside of The Apprentice is sufficient to warrant an article. TigerShark (talk) 13:55, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * No evidence of significant coverage other than for his involvement in The Apprentice. I'm not sure whether a television series such as this is "one event"; if not, it's still unlikely that a separate article is needed. List of The Apprentice candidates (UK) is very long - it should probably be split into separate articles for each series. Peter E. James (talk) 15:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:11, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of The Apprentice candidates (UK) as a useful redirect which allows a reader of Wikipedia to arrive at information related to his query. No need to merge as all the essetnial info is already there. -- Whpq (talk) 18:15, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect He is non notable but redirect as per suggestion from Whpq seems a sensible solution. Paste  Let’s have a chat. 18:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)'
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.