Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard G. Malley (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SpinningSpark 14:31, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Howard G. Malley
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability since Nov 2011, the only claim to fame of Malley is as producer of We are the World. Written like a promotional piece. Non notable IMO Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet WP:BIO criteria. Also, poorly written and with insufficient reference.--Rpclod (talk) 17:36, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, if only because a merge to the We Are the World section of the gigantic We are the World article is counterindicated. This content should not be lost, and there is no other good place to put it. WP:IAR is called for here, for purely expedient reasons. Sourcing and notability concerns have been met already, in the previous AfD, and no new deletion arguments have been brought forward. Anarchangel (talk) 23:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  01:26, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete Not notable enough and not enough sources to pass notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:55, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 14:27, 27 July 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.