Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Johns


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:16, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Howard Johns

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article has no verifiable sources and is mostly about people he claims to know, rather than himself. I don't think he is or his book is notable. I am also nominating the following related pages because it it about a book that has no verifable sources and it also appears to be non-notable:
 * Grahame (talk) 13:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   —Grahame (talk) 13:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hiding T 13:32, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   --  TravellingCari  16:55, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless substantial coverage can be found in reliable secondary sources. Jclemens (talk) 18:36, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, mainly because there is no information on the page thanks to, and the previous edits:
 * 1) Breached WP:BLP
 * 2) No sources
 * 3) Breached WP:NPOV
 * (At least, they did in my opinion. But I'm new to this.) James.Denholm&reg;Talk to me... 07:27, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.