Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Htm2pdf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:08, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Htm2pdf

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable software, the sources that are listed are either from the software's website itself, or are blogs. Legoktm (talk) 21:42, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 20 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable. The Internet is full of "convert from file format X to file format Y" websites, we possibly can't list all of them in Wikipedia, as very few of them &mdash; if any &mdash; are actually notable. --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 16:23, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:38, 27 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: I found no notability. SL93 (talk) 02:00, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Simply isn't notable. No coverage or other indication of encyclopedic relevance. --Michig (talk) 08:46, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I got the same search results as the 4 above me. No notability.  Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 20:21, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No sign of notability. Mr RD (talk) 12:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.