Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HtmlUnit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

HtmlUnit

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (software) requirement. Ping User:Tedickey who proposed this for deletion a while back, and User:Nigelj who objected. I reviewed the discussion, and the mentions of the software in academic works do not seem sufficient for me to merit its being encyclopedic. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 15:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as the best I found was some links at Books and News. SwisterTwister   talk  08:13, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:05, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep – Meets WP:GNG. Source examples include:, , , , .  pinging users pinged by the nominator and participants to review the sources I found using the Google Books link and Google Scholar link atop this discussion. North America1000 19:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * keep This is enormously well known to any practitioner in the field of automated or continuous testing for web apps. I wonder just how much WP:BEFORE was carried out here? Certainly asking a web developer would have cleared this up. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:25, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added another reference to further reading. Also Google Scholar shows it in use in many projects.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.