Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hu Wanlin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star  Mississippi  17:20, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Hu Wanlin

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Violates WP:BLPCRIME, specifically For individuals who are not public figures; that is, individuals not covered by, editors must seriously consider including material—in any article—that suggests the person has committed, or is accused of having committed, a crime, unless a conviction has been secured. There has been no conviction for homicide, only a conviction for practising medicine without a licence. The person is not independently notable fails WP:CRIMINAL. See also the discussion at WP:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Polyamorph (talk) 15:02, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Crime. Polyamorph (talk) 15:02, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:07, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Yikes. Too many WP:BLP concerns, no conviction for the crimes, notability is marginal. Ovinus (talk) 15:24, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per my comments at the BLP noticeboard. The only possible case for notability seems to be the allegations of a crime that he has never been convicted of committing; as a non-public figure the BLP implications there are not good.  His actual conviction for illegally practicing medicine is completely mundane (hardly rising to the levels recommended in WP:CRIMINAL of being well-documented and historically significant), and the coverage of it appears to be completely routine. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 08:21, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per Caeciliusinhorto's analysis.4meter4 (talk) 16:07, 9 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.