Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hu Zhiying


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Hu Zhiying

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Advertisement Wcam (talk) 12:33, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I do not recognize reliability in any of the linked sources. zh:胡志颖 was repeated deleted by G11 (multiple times this week already). I am also wondering if the whole thing is copied whole from somewhere. PS. if this is similar to the version you last deleted on ZHWP then you can probably nominate the same here.  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 15:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

I do recognize reliability in these of the linked sources. It is known that Hu Zhiying is famous contemporary artist from many important websites. So I support remain the entry. http://www.blouinartinfo.com/features/article/35022-beyond-the-chains-of-illusions-artist-hu-zhiyings-20-year-retrospective http://www.webalice.it/pitt12/Hu_Zhiying.html http://www.palm-art-award.com/nominee2010-huzhiying.html http://www.piziarte.net/HuZhiying2.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.63.97.38 (talk) 23:01, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * delete: cross-wiki spam. -Mys_721tx (talk) 23:11, 6 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete x-wiki spamming.--Antigng (talk) 14:24, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * This is a good entry that has showed for 3 years. It reflects Wikipedia is the free encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jujiang (talk • contribs) 15:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - Almost the entire article is praise from other people, like you would see on the back of a book. Elgatodegato (talk) 22:47, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete- obvious spam of a non-notable person. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:49, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Remain - The above words of the two persons are baseless and unreasonable, and contrary to the spirit of Wikipedia, because the words does not provide any basis materials, no principles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jujiang (talk • contribs) 10:44, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.