Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huang Szu-chi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. If these are renominated, separate AFDs are strongly suggested.  So Why  19:48, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Huang Szu-chi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

SvG, NSPORTS L3X1 (distant write)  21:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC) SvG= Sander.v.Ginkel. Was advised to bundle at AN/I discussion.L3X1 (distant write)  14:25, 16 April 2017 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because [fails GNG and NSPORT]:




 * Keep all: have represented their countries internationally. (And what does "SvG" mean?) Pam  D  23:12, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I said GNG. None of these people return anything for a Google search. Zip zilch nada. L3X1 (distant write)  02:00, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Google is not the be all and end all of notability (admit, i sometimes forget this:))Coolabahapple (talk) 09:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * SvG = User:Sander.v.Ginkel. The editor who had thousands of his articles sent to draft space if you recall that AN/I thread.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * this acronym - SVG not helpful, not all editors would know what it means ie. query from, and unsure as to relevance to afd?Coolabahapple (talk) 09:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * This provides a bit of background.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:20, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * thanks, i note that has been blocked indef for disruptive editing (related to these sort of articles?) Coolabahapple (talk) 09:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, indeed, I blocked them indef since they continued to move such articles into the main space en masse, they will be unblocked after Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents is concluded.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   01:24, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   01:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   01:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep and definitely shouldn't be bundled. This is an article with 2 reliable references showing the person represented their country internationally - and not Andorra or Monaco, but a nation of more than 20 million people. Without being able to search in Chinese, I cannot say there are not more sources. This was also moved to the mainspace by only 2 hours before AfD; more sources may take time, but what we hae is enough. Boleyn (talk) 06:26, 15 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Nom Com I suggest reading the AN/I discussion YMblanter linked above. If you want the article kept, userfy it now, mass deletion to the tune of some 75% is about to take place, I don't know when.L3X1 (distant write)  14:29, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 17:56, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails notability after ample time to demonstrate it. Ifnord (talk) 17:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

keep meets NATHLETE. afd is not a quality improvement process; if you have a quarrel with NSPORTS, and want to assert the supremacy of GNG, then change the policy. the mass deletion of articles that wery well meet notibility policy is proof of the moral sewer that prevails here. Beatley (talk) 16:45, 25 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.