Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huangqiao Sesame Cake


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Tastily kept. The Bushranger One ping only 07:33, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Huangqiao Sesame Cake

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Wikipedia is not a manual. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 10:33, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 12:53, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 12:53, 19 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep In my opinion it is possible to compile a decent article about this cake, see for example the book Food and Chinese culture:essays on popular cuisine (Long River Press, 2005, p. 171, available at G-Books). (The entry starts with: "The fame of the Huangqiao Sesame Cake probably has much to do with its geographic location and its cultural environment...") The article needs cleanup, not deletion. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 17:01, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Reliable source in article, reliable source stated above by user Vejvančický, and a high likelihood of additional available reliable sources to further establish notability. Northamerica1000 (talk) 10:40, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep (see below) A notable (or at least reliably sourced) foodstuff. Article needs a complete rewrite of course... Yunshui (talk) 10:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Reliable sources cover this, as others have pointed out. Its a perfectly acceptable food article.   D r e a m Focus  04:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep a perfectly valid food topic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:35, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep; considerable improvement with references since this version, which was current at the time of nomination for deletion. Antandrus (talk) 03:52, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.