Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huawei Nova 8


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Star  Mississippi  01:52, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Huawei Nova 8

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There is nothing notable about these two phones. A WP:BEFORE did not give out anything. All I could find was technical specifications on websites which are like catalogues, and cover (or try to cover) literally every mobile that exists. There are some reviews/unboxing videos, but same goes for them. No review by notable reviewer/critic. Just another run-of-the-mill mobile phones that exists. None of them passes WP:GNG. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete only Huawei Nova 7 There are not enough sources in Huawei Nova 7. Huawei Nova 8 has enough sources. -- Hajoon0102 💬 00:41, 2 July 2022 (UTC) Changed opinion. -- Hajoon0102  💬 11:55, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi. Would you kindly provide these sources covering Nova 8 here? Or are you talking about the sources provided in the article? —usernamekiran (talk) 08:28, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * . Please read WP:NEXIST.  It is not relevant what sources are actually in the article, only what sources that can be found. SpinningSpark 09:43, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay. You're right. -- Hajoon0102 💬 11:49, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Looking for more comment about Huawei Nova 8. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:16, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep both. There are plenty of reviews for both the Nova 8 and Nova 7 . SpinningSpark 09:55, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi. These are all technology related websites, and they try to review as many gadgets as possible. Being reviewed by them is not a sign of notability. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:14, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I'd love to hear a policy-based rationale why technology related websites do not contribute to notability. Spinning<b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b> 22:32, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep both Per Spinningspark's opinion. And, they're exist smartphone. -- Hajoon0102 💬 11:55, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hajoon0102 is creator of "Huawei Nova 8". —usernamekiran (talk) 19:14, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect both to Huawei Nova. — Sean Brunnock (talk) 19:53, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Where in that article are the Nova 7 and Nova 8 discussed? Sending users on wild goose hunts like this is just the sort of redirect we shouldn't create per WP:R. <b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b><b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b> 20:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.