Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huaxia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep, nomination withdrawn. Kusma (talk) 06:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Huaxia

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is a definition of a Chinese term; WP:NOT a dictionary. Wang C-H 19:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article is already more than a mere definition. It has a great deal of historical information as well.  I think it is worthy of being an article.--Danaman5 20:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. There's a good deal beyond a dictionary definition here. Articles on words are perfectly acceptable so long as they put the word in context; see Category:Interjections for a number of examples. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 22:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. It's not so much as a Chinese term, but the Chinese tribe that became the Han Chinese civilization. How this article can even be nominated for deletion is beyond me. _dk 23:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per all above. --Targeman 23:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Strong Keep - This is an extremely notable concept in Chinese history. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 03:53, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletions.   -- Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 03:53, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep per all above. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 05:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

I withdraw the nomination. Admins, please close. --Wang C-H 06:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.