Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hubert Tully


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:01, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Hubert Tully

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: inherently non-notable -- notability not acquired solely through "victimhood" (see here), which is a subjective term but I'll go with it. Quis separabit? 04:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:57, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:57, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:57, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, non-notable trivia; Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Kierzek (talk) 19:56, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I have a real problem when editors list books and provide no page numbers. Neither book (here and here) has text online so it's hard to easily check. With the POV issue going on here I'm not AGFing. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:10, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. EricSerge (talk) 21:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete article has serious POV issues, and no indication that good sources exist that could overcome them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:16, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * DElete -- Thoroughly NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.