Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hudo (scouting)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  02:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Hudo (scouting)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No indication of WP:Notability, and not clear that it belongs at en-wiki. Will never be larger than a stub (it's been 15 years; no refs). In-links from Cathole, and Outhouse. The Dutch nl:Hudo (toilet)&#91; ⟶ en&#93; has two refs, one (floep) appears to have been a passing mention in a wordlist (now 404s; no archive), and the other (in Dutch) is an etymological speculation positing Urdu origin for the Dutch word but says nothing about the concept. Maybe transwikify (per WP:NOTDICT) but maybe not at en-wikt, but only at nl:wikt:hudo. Mathglot (talk) 17:20, 23 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scouting-related deletion discussions. Mathglot (talk) 17:20, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The hudo article is a small gem. Deleting everything that isn't a major publication is IMHO a petty action. Definitely the article describes a worthwhile term in Scouting, and as such would be much better served with a recommendation for enhancement or improvement, than a deletion proposal. As such, I vote AGAINST DELETION.  Wim van Dorst  (talk)  18:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree with the above, Bduke (talk) 00:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.