Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hudson Relays


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. The Bushranger One ping only 07:35, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Hudson Relays

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

College tradition, limited to a single campus, no real indication of notability, no effort to provide sources to prove notability per WP:GNG. Article is just a description of the race and a list of past winners, nothing of real encyclopedic value. Notability questioned since March 2009, without resolution.GrapedApe (talk) 12:17, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. 16:58, 15 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 15 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TheSpecialUser TSU 01:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep. As is, I agree that the article needs a lot of work, but I do find this to be encyclopedic material on par with Little 500. While most of the coverage does appear to be from sites affiliated with Case Western, an argument could be made that it passes WP:GNG through a few mentions in independent reliable sources (e.g., , , , , ). Alternatively, this could be merged with something like Case Western Reserve University traditions in a format similar to Carnegie Mellon University traditions or Dartmouth College traditions. Location (talk) 16:06, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:37, 29 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.