Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hudson River Monster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. Rusf10 (talk)

Hudson River Monster

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:SYNTH of two different news stories, more than 100 years apart. The second of which is about a manatee and alone would fall under WP:NOTNEWS Rusf10 (talk) 05:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:53, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep, Nom, Hath Scotland not its Nessie? Hath Oregon not its Foot? Why depriveth thou this River Vallie of its Kipsie?   Also, I sourced it.  WP:SIGCOV).E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added another reference, but particularly note American Myths, Legends, and Tall Tales: An Encyclopedia of American Folklore: it's an academic encyclopaedia that managed to sustain a fairly substantial entry on this subject, so there's no reason why Wikipedia can't manage the same. Overall, I think the sources cited meet the 'significant coverage' required by WP:GNG. Alarichall (talk) 22:56, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.