Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hufu (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 17:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Hufu
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject fails at notability  My 76 Strat  04:02, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination  My 76 Strat  04:09, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per previous AfD, and you're the one who nominated it, so you can't vote twice.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:23, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Technically no one can vote at all, since AfD is not a WP:VOTE. My76Strat's comments will be properly evaluated by the closing administrator. -- RoninBK T C 19:56, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete "non-existent spoof product" with a website that briefly existed for barely a year and is now long gone. No evidence this was even especially notable as a hoax. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  04:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:33, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I've cleaned up and expanded the existing sources, including a link to the defunct page at the Wayback Machine. -- RoninBK T C 20:48, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. This shit is so cash. — Preceding unsigned comment added by  184.15.253.181  (talk • contribs)  09:56, January 12, 2011 (UTC)  — 184.15.253.181 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.