Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Betting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rugby union at the 1900 Summer Olympics. however, if someone thinks Rugby union at the 1900 Summer Olympics is preferable, that's also fine. Star  Mississippi  01:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Hugo Betting

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Prod removed without explanation or addition of sources. Prod justification was Fails WP:GNG, WP:SPORTCRIT #5, and WP:NOLYMPICS. No significant coverage in our article or the German article (there is one dead link there, the archived version can be found here but it only mentions him in a list of players), and no coverage identifiable in a search. BilledMammal (talk) 09:31, 26 April 2022 (UTC)


 * If nothing can be found on this guy, then redirect to Rugby union at the 1900 Summer Olympics per WP:ATD, WP:PRESERVE, WP:R and WP:CHEAP.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 11:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This whole article is anarchonistic falsehoods. Before 1908 Olympic competitors did not represent countries, which is why in a 1904 Olympics at some point they retconned a winner from being American (the person was a resident of the US, and came to the Olympics under the sponsorship of an American institution) to Norwegian (because he was technically a Norwegian citizen until about 3 months after the Olympics). In 1900 there were no medals at all. We should not be preseving false and misleading articles at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:31, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union,  and Germany.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:54, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Rugby union at the 1900 Summer Olympics Doesn't appear to be enough for a GNG pass, although there might be some offline sourcing in books for example. Source three doesn't really offer enough for a GNG pass. Without this though, redirect is a suitable WP:ATD and there doesn't look to be any confusion with the name to stop a redirect here. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:02, 30 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.