Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Burdon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  10:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Hugo Burdon

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

PROD removed. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCRIC. Initially the article made the claim this player debuted in first-class cricket in 2019, which was entirely made-up. This claim has been removed, with a new claim for notability added in that he was a substitute fielder in a Test match. This too does not make the player notable. Until they debut at senior domestic level, they will fail CRIN and by extension GNG. StickyWicket (talk) 09:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. StickyWicket (talk) 09:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. StickyWicket (talk) 09:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. StickyWicket (talk) 09:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. StickyWicket (talk) 09:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The subject did take the field, ie, they did play, in an international game at the highest possible level of cricket.  So it seems they do pass WP:NCRIC #1.  (The subject though was only a substitute fielder, ie, they cannot bat or bowl, but they can take a catch or run a batter out.)  While they might pass NCRIC, that is only a presumption of N, not a proof of N.  There is a reasonable amount of coverage, mostly routine, for the subject's activities at lower levels of cricket.  In short the subject fails GNG at this time, ie, simply way WP:TOOSOON.  If the subject is as good as the media indicate, then it might not be too long before they also pass GNG.  Aoziwe (talk) 12:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. Substitute fielders do not fall under the criteria of playing in an international game at the highest possible level of cricket, their apperances on the field are not capped and they are often provided by the county/state/province team based at the venue being used for the international match. In the past coaches have deputised on the field, I recall a team physio filling in and I think there has even been an occasion in which a spectator has taken to the field. So he doesn't meet the NCRIC criteria. And as said has been mentioned, any other coverage is routine, plus we don't create articles on club cricketers until they've stepped up to a higher level. StickyWicket (talk) 14:07, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom, Fails WP:NCRIC with no notable appearances, and while there is some coverage of him 12th manning, it is passing mentions and not enough for a GNG pass. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:49, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.