Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Hinckfuss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Hugo Hinckfuss

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not pass WP:GNG at present due to insufficient coverage in reliable third-party sources. His Olympic participation no longer makes him automatically notable as per recent changes to WP:NOLY. JTtheOG (talk) 00:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. JTtheOG (talk) 00:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. JTtheOG (talk) 00:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO and WP:NOLY. LibStar (talk) 00:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Also with placing so far back in competition, I don't think he's worthy of a redirect. LibStar (talk) 01:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per above rationales. WWGB (talk) 01:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WWGB. --Vaco98 (talk) 02:45, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Hack (talk) 04:24, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. In addition to agreeing with the above, I searched Google, Newsbank and WikiLibrary but couldn't find any RS (eg this scant passing mention on the | ABC). He was named 2021 Snowsports Young Achiever of the Year, which I've added to the page, but that's not enough to justify it yet-- at best WP:TOOSOON.Cabrils (talk) 01:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable Olympian. I am not sure what the logical number of redirects would be, but if you are below 50th that is clearly way to low to be a redirect.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.