Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo de Garis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 01:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Hugo de Garis

 * — (View AfD)

It's not clear that this person is significant or notable; No details are given about significant achievements or contributions to society. There's no sign of any sort of peer-reviewed publication or widely available or known work, or of anything significant that he's done or produced. Earlier versions of this article were speedily deleted as they made no attempt to claim significance for him. As it's just being recreated each time, I thought it best to bring it here to see if others shared my view or not. Mnemopis 22:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Recently interviewed on BBC's Horizon ]]): and presented as one of the two leading futurists (the other one was Ray KurzweilHe also seems to have a fair number of articles published and some web-pages about thim. Just google "Hugo de Garis". --Denoir 04:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


 * List of peer-reviewed publications: --Denoir 04:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep although some of the language has an "in universe" appearance and the references are messed up, seems to meet WP:BIO. Note, a comment visible below is actually from Articles for deletion/Inertialess drive, at least until DumbBot or somebody can fix it. --Dhartung | Talk 15:48, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, notable in the AI field, should easily pass WP:PROF but urgently needs work cleaning up those references. Alf photoman 16:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable individual, published, etc. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cardsplayer4life (talk • contribs).
 * Strong Keep notable and published, also is WP:PROF Example 1 for The Artilect War. And per third sentence of article. Meets WP:BIO as the primary subject of multiple  verifiable independent sources. The article's history goes to 2002, it is not in the deletion log.  skip (t / c) 08:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep important AI researcher M Alan Kazlev 12:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep notable and published --Denoir 16:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * keep clearly notable; perhaps the nominator was put off by section 3, about his theories. This section needs rewriting in an encyclopedic way, but that is no reason to delete. DGG 07:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.