Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hui kit wah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 23:13, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Hui kit wah

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This person simply doesn't seem notable, and the way article is written prevents reasonable research into the person's potential actual notability. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 16:13, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: The article does not demonstrate notability. Jennifer500 (talk) 17:39, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note, Jennifer500 was blocked for ban evasion. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:57, 10 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  cab (talk) 09:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete His Chinese name can be found easily on the website of the Liuhebafachuan Liu Guiyao Association mentioned in the article . It's a rather common name, but searching for it in conjunction with other stuff mentioned in his article like taijiquan, liuhebafa , etc. brings up zero reliable sources about him. His closest brush with notability appears to be writing (not even being the subject of) a magazine article . Other GHits are just ads for his classes on bulletin boards and the like.


 * Incidentally, we deleted the article about his teacher a few months ago too: Articles for deletion/Lu Gui Yao. Cheers, cab (talk) 09:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  03:16, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: The article doesn't cite any references. South Bay (talk) 04:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 20:16, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.