Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hujjatal Islam wal Muslimeen Shaykh Allama Sayyad Muhammad Zahed Hossein Baqir Naqvi Hanafi Razvi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy deleted by Alphachimp (Per CSD A7 - Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject.). Non-admin closure of orphaned AFD. Serpent&#39;s Choice 05:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Hujjatal Islam wal Muslimeen Shaykh Allama Sayyad Muhammad Zahed Hossein Baqir Naqvi Hanafi Razvi

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

There is no evidence that this man even exists. The article carries a distinctive air of silly vandalism. Aurochs (Talk | Block) 06:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete unless reliable sources are found. I wouldn't hold my breath on that. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * BJAODN I haven't laughed so hard in a while. With apologies to the Muslims among us, his over-the-top nomenclature strains the boundaries of sanity. YechielMan 23:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete and Salt A7 (bio) and/or G1 (nonsense). Google search for the term comes right back to a WP redirect that is simply the article title prefixed with "His Eminence, " as well as a wiki mirror and answers.com - neither of which have anything on the phrase.  If this guy is all this and a bag of chips, there'd be more than wiki mirrors on him.  I'll tag the redirect as well. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 23:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete but not speedy possible--even probable-- hoaxes should be visible for a few days before deletion, just as they are in prod. A speedy is not acceptable for a hoax, as is explained on the relevant WP pages. DGG 00:55, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This is true, DGG, but... well, would an A7 work based on my own (lack of) findings? This is, after all, what I have it listed as. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 03:02, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy deleted already. I suppose the AfD should be closed now. --Aurochs (Talk | Block)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.