Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hula Popper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  03:30, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Hula Popper


Neologism, possible WP:NFT fodder. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 06:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete - random nonsense. –-  kungming·  2 | (Talk ·Contact) 06:45, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 08:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. But keep a copy just for the term "seamen discharge". Lifeboats anyone? Bubba hotep 17:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Great point! =) Seems like the author of the article has changed it though... Pity... –-  kungming·  2 | (Talk ·Contact) 01:52, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, it may as well go then! ;) Bubba hotep 01:58, 11 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete oh my. Neologism.  Lankiveil 01:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC).
 * Delete per WP:NFT. Sounds more like something you'd find on the appetizer menu at T.G.I. Friday's than a sexual term.  Wavy G 19:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * You wouldn't want to order that item (let alone eat it) if it ever appeared on their menu now, would you? Bubba hotep 21:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * After this? Oh, hell no. Actually, fried peppers stuffed with pineapple and bacon?  That sounds pretty good...  Just, uhh, hold the white sauce, please. Wavy G 23:54, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.