Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hulless popcorn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirect to popcorn. –  Rob e  rt  01:05, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Hulless popcorn
Nom but No Vote: Procedural nomination, since User:Freakofnurture tagged it for speedy with template:nonsense despite it being a coherant article. (Perhaps the start of an article, or a sec'n deserving a rdr, in my casual opinion.) --Jerzy•t 19:14, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to popcorn. Hulless popcorn exists, but the article comes close to pure nonsense.Bjones 19:18, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Bjones. Could be expanded into a separate article later, but the current one isn't appropriate.  --Alan Au 19:24, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to popcorn but save nothing. First- and second-person writing is not encyclopedic. 147.70.242.21 19:30, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Slowly Delete instead, though I question the coherency. There is nothing to merge. If the topic can be legitimately addressed in the popcorn article, go ahead and redirect, but only then. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( TALK )  19:39, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to popcorn, but this article is a nonsense. Carioca 21:52, 2 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.