Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hum Chale Aaye


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 11:27, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Hum Chale Aaye

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This tele-film does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines WP:NFILM and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Saqib (talk) 16:07, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict69  16:14, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict69  16:16, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. <b style="color:#3399FF">Redditaddict</b><b style="color:#339900">6</b><b style="color:#3399FF">9</b>  16:16, 2 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep this article as it is star studded film and has based on social issue of joint family systems and their problems which is common in Pakistan.Film also had good reception and has million of views on YouTube.Lillyput4455 (talk) 22:14, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Not a policy based argument to keep the page. --Saqib (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom. Lack of convincing argument by the creator. शिव साहिल/Shiv Sahil (talk) 15:18, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per this sources https://nation.com.pk/25-Jun-2017/mehreen-jabbar-mohammad-ahmad-and-marina-khan-the-m-trio-reunite-on-eid, https://www.thenews.com.pk/magazine/instep-today/332337-mehreen-jabbar-returns-to-small-screen-with-two-eid-telefilms. The telefilm has received significent coverage in this RS. 39.44.38.65 (talk) 08:54, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * This user is sock of
 * unproven allegation Atlantic306 (talk) 17:49, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:15, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as has received coverage in Pakistani reliable sources such as the Nation and The News as linked above, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 17:49, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I've reviewed all the sources, and see nothing but name checking, which longstanding practice holds cannot be used to support the notability of the subject. In no source presented can I find the subject discussed with the "significant coverage" WP:GNG requires. --Saqib (talk) 04:14, 16 September 2018 (UTC)


 * more than namechecking, several paragraphs in each of the sources listed above, the second being a review including critical analysis Atlantic306 (talk) 19:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. A tele-film. 2 refs in the article 1 doesn't mention it, the other not in depth. News returning nothing substantial i can see. Szzuk (talk) 09:44, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –&#8239;Joe (talk) 20:43, 16 September 2018 (UTC) *Keep as film meet wikipedia guidelines for WP:television and has reliable sources from international newspapers like Nation.Com and The News.Lillyput4455 (talk) 00:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Not sure I see that much of an issue here now that some reliable sources have been added to the article. Meets WP: GNG well enough to pass, barely though. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:20, 20 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.