Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human-Thistlethwaite algorithm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein (talk) 11:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Human-Thistlethwaite algorithm

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is just somebody's solution for the Rubik cube, which he's put onto Youtube. There is also a biographical article that goes with it and should also probably be deleted. Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 18:48, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see anything about it, digging through rubiks cube solution pages. Some solutions are notable because they relate to optimization strategies or solve bigger problems.  If this is just a reworking of an existing solution to be done manually, I'm not sure that is notable. Protonk (talk) 23:47, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above and other. Articles are supposed to understandable to everyone, not just experts. This may also fall under WP:NOT. I know this would mean that all rubix helpers fall under that. Mm40|Talk|Sign|Review 14:00, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I also don't believe the refs. are reliable. Mm40|Talk|Sign|Review 14:01, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.